NeuBench

Statement on the comments from Secretary of War Pete Hegseth

Anthropic has responded to Secretary of War Pete Hegseth’s claim that the Department of War will designate the company a supply chain risk. The company says it has not received direct communication from the War Department or the White House and maintains that its exceptions to the lawful use of Claude—mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons—have not impacted any government mission. Anthropic argues the designation would be unprecedented, legally unsound, and would set a dangerous precedent for American AI firms negotiating with the government.

Deployment Platform
Hugging Face
Cloud Infrastructure
Category
Models
Industry Domain

The Core Development

Earlier today, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth shared on X that he is directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply chain risk. This action follows months of negotiations that reached an impasse over two exceptions we requested to the lawful use of our AI model, Claude: the mass domestic surveillance of Americans and fully autonomous weapons.

We have not yet received direct communication from the Department of War or the White House on the status of our negotiations.

We have tried in good faith to reach an agreement with the Department of War, making clear that we support all lawful uses of AI for national security aside from the two narrow exceptions above. To the best of our knowledge, these exceptions have not affected a single government mission to date.

Real-World Use Cases & Applications

We held to our exceptions for two reasons. First, we do not believe that today’s frontier AI models are reliable enough to be used in fully autonomous weapons. Allowing current models to be used in this way would endanger America’s warfighters and civilians. Second, we believe that mass domestic surveillance of Americans constitutes a violation of fundamental rights.

No amount of intimidation or punishment from the Department of War will change our position on mass domestic surveillance or fully autonomous weapons. We will challenge any supply chain risk designation in court.

Deployment & Availability

Our sales and support teams are standing by to answer any questions you may have.

We are deeply grateful to our users, and to the industry peers, policymakers, veterans, and members of the public who have voiced their support in recent days. Thank you. Above all else, our priorities are to protect our customers from any disruption caused by these extraordinary events and to work with the Department of War to ensure a smooth transition—for them, for our troops, and for American military operations.

Strategic Perspective & Ecosystem Impact

Designating Anthropic as a supply chain risk would be an unprecedented action—one historically reserved for US adversaries, never before publicly applied to an American company. We are deeply saddened by these developments. As the first frontier AI company to deploy models in the US government’s classified networks, Anthropic has supported American warfighters since June 2024 and has every intention of continuing to do so.

We believe this designation would both be legally unsound and set a dangerous precedent for any American company that negotiates with the government.

Secretary Hegseth has implied this designation would restrict anyone who does business with the military from doing business with Anthropic. The Secretary does not have the statutory authority to back up this statement. Legally, a supply chain risk designation under 10 USC 3252 can only extend to the use of Claude as part of Department of War contracts—it cannot affect how contractors use Claude to serve other customers.

Why it matters

The situation highlights the legal and operational risks AI companies face when negotiating with U.S. defense agencies, and it underscores the importance of clear regulatory frameworks for AI deployment in national security contexts.

Topic dossiers Anthropic & Claude Hugging Face