
Here’s why making AI safe with AI oversight is harder than you think: …Automated alignment research is not a silver bullet… Many researchers in AI safety think the best way to build smarter-than-human machines safely is to have AI systems supervise some of the training process. Why is automated alignment research hard? “Errors in automated alignment research are likely to be harder to identify than the human baseline,” they write.
Welcome to Import AI, a newsletter about AI research. Import AI runs on arXiv, cappuccinos, and feedback from readers. If you’d like to support this, please subscribe.
The AI economy in the US is growing at 2,000% a year: …The more directly you measure the AI economy, the weirder and more unprecedented it seems to get… Economists with the University of Virginia* and Anthropic, and the Bank of Canada have written a paper outlining both the tremendous growth of the emerging “AI economy” in the US, and wrestling with why this growth is hard to see in aggregate GDP statistics. “The AI economy in the United States has been growing at an unprecedented rate, but this extraordinary growth is largely invisible in conventional GDP statistics,” they write. “Treating the AI sector as a coherent economic entity yields preliminary estimates of nominal AI GDP at approximately $250 billion in 2025, growing at roughly 2,600 percent per year in quality-adjusted real terms.”
Why it’s hard to see: There are a couple of factors here - one is that though the datacenter building boom is large it still isn’t quite large enough to uplift GDP significantly. By comparison, where the majority of AI’s economic impact is taking place is in AI inference - the usage of AI’s systems - but there are confounding factors here as it relates to GDP measurement: “Nominal AI revenues grow only moderately because per-unit prices for any given level of AI capability fall almost as fast as quality-adjusted output rises,” they write.
If we can’t measure this, we might end up surprised in a way that’s hard to recover from: “AI is the latest in a series of fast-moving technologies that have raised measurement concerns; semiconductors and the internet generated similar debates in their time,” they write. But a key difference is that AI as a technology might have a far bigger impact on labor than these other technologies. “In the prior episodes, the rapidly improving technology was a complement to human labor at the aggregate level,” they write. “AI is the first plausible candidate for large-scale technological mismeasurement in which the rapidly improving sector may become a substitute for human labor”.
Nominal compute spending : US compute spending rose from $37 billion in 2023 to $90 billion in 2024 to $219 billion in 2025.
Raw compute capacity : Due to efficiencies in newer chips, actual capacity grows even faster than spending: “US AI computing capacity grew at more than 200 percent per year”.
Welcome to Import AI, a newsletter about AI research Reported by Import AI on June 1, 2026.